User contributions
From ISFDB
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 06:05, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 05:55, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 05:49, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 05:41, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 05:35, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions
- 05:17, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 05:13, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 05:10, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 04:54, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 04:47, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Indentation, syntax)
- 04:41, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 03:15, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 03:07, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Invisible comments to editors (<!-- -->) appear only while editing the page.)
- 02:32, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Essay in non-genre book)
- 02:30, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Essay in non-genre book)
- 02:24, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Typo, syntax/clarity, punctuation)
- 02:03, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Typos, easy to find signature)
- 01:33, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→Tami Hoag)
- 01:31, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Pseudonym direction)
- 01:30, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Typo)
- 01:26, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Punctuation, indentation)
- 01:19, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Typo)
- 01:06, 3 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (Superscripting made for odd linebreaking; Typos fixed)
- 23:23, 2 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE "best practices?")
- 23:05, 2 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 04:33, 2 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 02:36, 2 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 02:20, 2 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 23:41, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m User talk:JLaTondre (→Cover arttist found)
- 23:38, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 23:29, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:JLaTondre (→Oops!: new section)
- 23:11, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 23:06, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 23:00, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 21:50, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 21:48, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 13:58, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→How is this justified without flagrantly disregarding our own guidelines?)
- 13:54, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→How is this justified without flagrantly disregarding our own guidelines?)
- 12:27, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m Rules and standards discussions (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 12:18, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:Chrisgherr (Undo revision 446858 by Hauck (Talk))
- 11:36, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) User:Chrisgherr (New page: Hi ... it's I!)
- 11:32, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) Rules and standards discussions (→Disappointed!: new section)
- 11:14, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:Hauck/Archive16 (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 11:08, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m User talk:Hauck/Archive16 (→Why must we IGNORE best practices?)
- 11:06, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) m User talk:Chrisgherr (→Disappointed!: new section)
- 10:53, 1 November 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:Hauck/Archive16 (→Disappointed!: new section)
- 23:33, 31 October 2016 (hist) (diff) Image:STNDNGSTRS2012.jpg ({{CID1 |Title=Astounding Stories of Super-Science, January 1930 |Edition=Project Gutenberg 2012 ebook |Pub=STNDNGSTRS2012 |Publisher=Project Gutenberg |Artist=H. W. Wessolowski |Source=Scanned by User:Chrisgherr}}) (top)
- 21:25, 31 October 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:Chrisgherr (→Your submission to unmerge ...)
- 21:10, 31 October 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:Chrisgherr (→Your submission to unmerge ...)
- 21:08, 31 October 2016 (hist) (diff) User talk:Chrisgherr (→Your submission to unmerge ...)
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
