User talk:Orcolat

Welcome!

Hello, Orcolat, and welcome to the ISFDB Wiki! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Help pages
• Field-by-field guide to entering new publications into the database
• Help:Getting Started
• What the ISFDB Wiki is for
• FAQ
• Wiki editing help - Tips on how to use the wiki-specific features when editing wiki pages.
• Wiki Conventions - How things are usually done on this wiki.
• Help:How to upload images to the ISFDB wiki

Note: Image uploading isn't entirely automated. You're uploading the files to the wiki which will then have to be linked to the database by editing the publication record.

Please be careful in editing publications that have been primary verified by other editors. See Help:How to verify data#Making changes to verified pubs. But if you have a copy of an unverified publication, verifying it can be quite helpful. See Help:How to verify data for detailed information.

I hope you enjoy editing here! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out the community portal, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hauck 10:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Axiomatic

Hello, I've approved your submission. As it seems that you own a copy of the book, please think of becoming its primary verifier.Hauck 10:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Hauck. How quick! Thanks.

Yes, I have the book and I'd perform primary verification in a shortwhile.

I have a doubt however: the record was for 1998-07-00 and all the details but this fit, i.e. I cannot find a reference to July as the month of publishing in the printed version I have. It simply states reprinted 1998. (Orcolat)

A secondary source was likely used but not given (bad idea) probably locus or worse amazon. In such cases, I add a note along the lines of "origin of pub month unknown, none on book". Hauck 10:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Lazarus Long l'immortale (1987)

I uploaded a bad-phone-camera-taken scan of the cover due to actual scanner not working. I'll replace it asap. --Orcolat 10:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

I also have a note for the missing ISBN and price warnings of this reprint: there are none on the book, definitely. Don't know how to cope with this. --Orcolat 10:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Just a short hint: It's better to address issues like that on the help page or on the talk/discussion page of a distinct editor (that way that person gets the message of new content - placed on your talk page a new note might be easily overlooked). If there is no ISBN, please add a note with this content to the publication in question. Thanks, Stonecreek 11:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Took note of the hint and set note editing the publication. Orcolat 11:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. or Kurt Vonnegut?

You state that the author is 'printed as Kurt Vonnegut'. We do catalogue an author's name as stated on the title page (and then variant it to the canonical name, if a pseudonym is used). So, what is the name on the title page of Mattatoio n.5 o La crociata dei bambini (I've put your submission on hold while waiting for an answer). Thanks, Stonecreek 13:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

it's Kurt Vonnegut alone, sorry, forgot to make the right change on submission. Orcolat 13:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

I approved the submission, changed the author, unmerged it and varianted it to the original. I also added the translator to the title, which should be added in case there are different translations using the same title or different titles that use the same translation (best to add it anyway as you never know what the future might bring). Stonecreek 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I uploaded the cover scan for completeness. Orcolat 15:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Robot - Rivista di Fantascienza, Anno II, n. 12, Marzo 1977

Hello, I've approved your submission. Some points: 1) for a magazine there's no need to enter some of the data => series number = it's implict in your title; same for the publication series and its number and the ID# (a magazine is in fact its own publication series); 2) You'll perhaps need to adjust your title to have a "nicer-looking" grid here (everything just after the comma appears in the grid, IMHO you could delete the anno part to have a grid like this one or just left the number like here); 3) you're right the recuring essays (editorial, letter column, etc...) will have to be disambiguated after you choose a "definitive" title (as here); 4) the non linked reviews (without an hyperlink) will have to be treated (either by entereing into the db the corresponding book if eligible or by transforming them into ESSAYs); 5) the translated texts will have to be varianted (please ask if you need help). It's a lot of things but magazines are one of the more complicated part of the db. Result is title level, publication level. Hauck 17:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the check and first changes.

• 1&2 I modified the title to improve the issue grid
• 3 Thanks for taking care of that, I'll use that solution for the other issues of the same magazine.
• 4 I'll work on the review/essay part, I'll see if I find the right volume info somewhere, otherwise I'll move to essays.
• 5 it seems that translated titles are linked correctly already (is it automatic or did you do it?). Should I edit them to enter the translator in a note?

They were probably linked by another moderator (it's not automatic). The translator should go in the notes at title level because of our rule: one translation=one title.Hauck 14:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm happy I'm starting to understand how a magazine fits into the DB.

Some more questions

A) is it ok to submit minimal magazine issue stubs and then resubmit the full content? Or is it better to go full content since the first submission?

IMHO it's better to procede by small increments (even if it means more work for the moderators), you can add in notes to moderator something along the lines of "work in progress". Hauck 14:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

B) Robot changed publisher, after a long time gap, going from #39 to #41, 1979 to 2006, will that be a problem to keep the Series as a whole?

It's not a problem, magazines like Astounding/Analog changed publishers many times.Hauck 14:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again, please note I'm travelling these couple of weeks, so I won't be promptly reacting.

Here I am again. I finished my searches for the REVIEW items. It seems someone else took care of linking them, but...

1. 2 out of 4 are correct (Le primavere del mostro and Macaluso alla Casa Bianca)
2. King Kong points to a wrong one, I found the correct one on the renewed (quite) Vegetti catalogue: here. Am I correct I have to enter it as a VARIANT since author is different?

Your link seems to be incorrect. Hauck 13:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh, my! I apologize, I messed up the copy&paste and badly used the external link button. Here it it.

1. L'anno del sole quieto points to a 2007-07 Urania Collezione edition, but I suppose it's better to point it to the Libra 2nd edition of 1976-01, it's nearer in time and makes more sense.

I can operate both changes if you address me to a wiki page help that explains how to do the right linking, adding the variant I think I know how to manage.

Go to the review's page here, choose the "Link Review to Title" hyperlink on the left, replace in the "Title #" the present ID by the correct one (in this case 1435709), then submit the lot. Hauck 13:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I'll anyway wait for your reply before going on. Orcolat 13:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I submitted the change in the link to the review for L'anno del sole quieto to what I suppose is the correct title (I confirm is the one you reported above).

I also submitted the variant title for the King Kong. When/If it comes up I'll add to it at least one publication from the NILF (refurbished Vegetti) catalogue and do the review to title linkage.

King Kong

Hello, I've approved your submission and changed format to tp (as per dimensions given), I've also "simplified" the authorship awaiting a future primary verification. Hauck 14:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! With some delay due to other business, I linked the review of Robot #12 to it. Orcolat 12:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)